... ¹

Talk presented on the Philosophy of Science Seminar, Eötvös, Budapest, 8 October 2001.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... supervenes²

I mean supervenience in the sense of local supervenience in Chalmer's terminology (D. J. Chalmers, The Conscious Mind, Oxford University Press, 1996).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...³

J. Earman and W. Salmon, The Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses, In M. H. Salmon, et al., Introduction to Philosophy of Science, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...⁴

This is actually a trivial consequence of the Pitowsky theorem (I. Pitowsky, Quantum Probability - Quantum Logic, Lecture Notes in Physics 321 , Springer, Berlin 1998).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.